boudicea

Resident Members
  • Content count

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

boudicea last won the day on October 31 2012

boudicea had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

8 Neutral

1 Follower

About boudicea

  • Rank
    Getting There
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Many and various including England and it's history, research, legislation, law, art, reading non-fiction books and Terry Pratchett's discworld books.
  1. Did you know the DECC Department for the Environment and Climate change wizards think it's OK to geoengineer the weather, and released two documents on it, with the most dangerous lunatic ideas in them, like chemtrailing to block sunlight, and other things? So it is entirely likely they can make drought, floods, snow etc. to order.
  2. I sincerely hope that will happen for all of you, mind you the arbitrageurs, government, and the banks in the city of london will find some way to rob everyone no doubt, just as they have with all those hard working baby boomers, who did save for pensions and were then robbed.
  3. If the training colleges had stuck to Peels Principles we would all be the better for it. As it is training is more like that undertaken by Eurogendfor military police force, the EU's rapid reaction force to 'help' nation's police forces quell civil unrest. Question is do we want the style of policing that is seen on the continent? Peel's Principles of policing The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions. Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public. The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force. Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law. Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient. Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence. Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
  4. It would seem that money has replaced principles in today's society, and the police seem to be no different. This is not fair to all of the dedicated constables and officers out there. The government are even trying to remove the oath to Her Majesty. The new PCCs certainly don't swear an oath to her. Bring back the British Bobby, and stop militarising our police force with black uniforms giving them a sinister look. Targets make a mockery of proper policing, and they should be scrapped. Increase the budget for our wonderful police and stop trying to privatise them. Ever since the police became reactive instead of proactive because of lack of manpower, the country has been the poorer for it.
  5. Maybe that is what they are counting on. Trouble is what about those who are left? My local Chief Constable is retiring in about a month.
  6. I understand that it is not only the police who are losing their pensions through short service, but also the army personnel who are being 'let go' just before they would qualify for their pensions, yet we keep hearing spokemen pushing us to save for our pensions. This is just crazy talk with no common sense attached.
  7. I believe that the police under certain circumstances should be able to withdraw their labour, and the privatisation of the police is one of those circumstances, because it is a dangerous move, and the country will be less safe, due to money being the driver, instead of fighting crime. Cost is already being used to determine which crimes will be investigated, and prosecuted, and which will not, and that is not true justice for the public. Mussolini said that a marriage of corporate interests and politics leads to fascism, and the public are already experiencing the beginnings of that. Perhaps politicians protection officers should be the first? So you are saying that politicians who break the laws of the land are not committing a crime? That the police have no business investigating that crime, even if it is the major crime of High Treason committed by politicians against the country and it's people? Incidentally the laws are not extinct, they are still extant, and for all time. So can you give me a valid reason for these criminals not to be brought to justice, just because 40 odd years have passed, and for 30 of those years the treason was hidden under the Official Secrets Act, because Heath was told his actions were illegal and unconstitutional? We have not had a properly constitutionally constituted parliament since 1911 when the Parliament Act was passed, because it overawed the House of Lords, and destroyed any check on the Commons overreaching ambitions. You seem to have a problem with my tag name - it is a mix of a number of the ways to spell this name, and as far as I can recall, initially the forum would not allow me to have a correct spelling as it had been taken. So that mystery is now solved.
  8. This explains why our country is in such dire straits today. Those so blind they refuse to see the truth. This is just such a low brow answer, and typical of a modern brainwashed mind. Look up this country's checkered history, and the great men who tried to protect it from invaders and foreign rule down through the centuries. You might start with William III and Mary in 1688/9 and take a look at the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9, you will find it on legislation.gov website, and you will find out it is to protect the rights and liberties of the English 'for all time'.
  9. There is no need for the police to go on strike. All they need to do is to do their job and investigate the allegations of treachery made against this country by Cameron, Clegg, Blair, Major, Maude and Hurd. These are the people who have caused massive damage to the UK and its police force. Why risk strike defeat when you can win by doing your job and using the law? Here are the links to the allegations. You will need to put pressure on your Chief Constables and the MET to take positive action and rescue this country and the police force from the hands of these men. https://www.dropbox.com/s/chlfjw169efbur7/Allegation%20Cameron%20Clegg%20and%20Blair.docx https://www.dropbox.com/s/ir48pkytgkvefzd/Maastricht%20allegations.doc Before we illegally joined the EU in 1972, the words 'racism', 'xenophobia', and 'multiculturalism' were invisible to the general public and the police. Sadly these fascist state control words are now all too prevalent, very often eclipsing 'reasonableness' and 'common sense', and closing down free speech, as the thought police zealots infiltrate and infest our public bodies like Cicero's plague, pushing political correctness to stupid and ridiculous levels to intimidate the population. It is high time and essential that destructive 'Common Purpose' and 'Frankfurt School' graduates/supporters of the Fourth Reich were shed from public life before it is too late for the rest of us. Under our English Common Law the words 'What a reasonable man would do' usually settled most matters, and only then would the matter go to litigation, but the EU have illegally imposed so many regulations and Laws, that it makes a mockery of our police and once fine justice system, turning it into a system where criminals rule and victims become the criminals. This all came about because a prime minister was blackmailed because of his nasty habits, into signing the treaty of membership to the EU, ignoring English Constitutional restraints which should have stopped him, and in the process a major crime was committed against Her Majesty and the people of the UK. It is the crime that dare not speak it's name lest it becomes open fact, and it is still being ignored. Even then the Vienna Convention on the Law on Treaties 1969 & 1986 should have put a stop to the nonsense, because under the articles of those conventions, the treaty that was signed in 1972, on which all the others depended, made all of the EU treaties 'null and void' and 'of no legal force'. This begs a question as to why parliament still pays lip service to membership of a corrupt organisation, paying money illegally to it even though it is against the articles/rules of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Who benefits from this deception?
  10. Before we illegally joined the EU in 1972, the words 'racism', 'xenophobia', and 'multiculturalism' were invisible to the general public and the police. Sadly these fascist state control words are now all too prevalent, very often eclipsing 'reasonableness' and 'common sense', and closing down free speech, as the thought police zealots infiltrate and infest our public bodies like Cicero's plague, pushing political correctness to stupid and ridiculous levels to intimidate the population. It is high time and essential that destructive 'Common Purpose' and 'Frankfurt School' graduates/supporters of the Fourth Reich were shed from public life before it is too late for the rest of us. Under our English Common Law the words 'What a reasonable man would do' usually settled most matters, and only then would the matter go to litigation, but the EU have illegally imposed so many regulations and Laws, that it makes a mockery of our police and once fine justice system, turning it into a system where criminals rule and victims become the criminals. This all came about because a prime minister was blackmailed because of his nasty habits, into signing the treaty of membership to the EU, ignoring English Constitutional restraints which should have stopped him, and in the process a major crime was committed against Her Majesty and the people of the UK. It is the crime that dare not speak it's name lest it becomes open fact, and it is still being ignored. Even then the Vienna Convention on the Law on Treaties 1969 & 1986 should have put a stop to the nonsense, because under the articles of those conventions, the treaty that was signed in 1972, on which all the others depended, made all of the EU treaties 'null and void' and 'of no legal force'. This begs a question as to why parliament still pays lip service to membership of a corrupt organisation, paying money illegally to it even though it is against the articles/rules of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Who benefits from this deception?
  11. I can remember a time just as other posters to this forum do, when we had bobbies living in the communities they policed, and walking the beat just as the PCSOs now do. I strongly believe that for whatever reason politicians wanted to distance the police from the people, and they almost succeeded. After they closed local police stations and houses, and bobbies on the beat stopped being from their own community, with the style of policing moving from pro-active policing deterring crime, to re-active policing only responding when the crime had been committed. Time for some old tried and tested methods of policing by attested constables, and fighting tooth and nail against privatisation of the police for profit. G4S took over the backroom duties of Lincolnshire police, and a few months later shed nearly half the staff. Where this company go, job losses follow.
  12. Since 1972 the 'government' have been an illegal gathering, and all the legislation they have passed is null and void, because they handed their authority to Brussels. They broke their parliamentary oaths to the Queen and Her people and our constitutional laws to do so. A group of the public who have researched the legislation and laws of our British Constitution have been asking Chief Constables to arrest the traitors within our parliament, by reporting the major crime of High Treason and Treason Felony which has had a mixed response. Some forces have been hiding behind their force solicitors, and refusing to accept that a crime has been committed, while others have given the report a number and forwarded it on up the line. This 'illegal gathering' are the one's who have beggared the country and everyone's pensions with it. You now come under illegal EU command, and they want to instill a police state in this country via their change agents Common Purpose and the Frankfurt School. This quote borrowed from another user: Sir James Anderton, Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (1976-1991) said in 1982: "I see in our midst an enemy more dangerous,insidious and ruthless than any faced since the Second World War... a long term political strategy to destroy the proven structures of the police." The people need protection and it isn't going to come from the chief charlatans with their hands on the reins of power.
  13. Morek54 quotes: Sir James Anderton, Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (1976-1991) said in 1982: "I see in our midst an enemy more dangerous,insidious and ruthless than any faced since the Second World War... a long term political strategy to destroy the proven structures of the police." It is not just the Police structure that Common Purpose want to destroy, it is the very fabric of our public services, culture, identity, and history countrywide, and at present they are doing a good job. They use Neuro-linguistic programming to brainwash their 'graduates', although I would call them 5th column subversives being trained 'to lead beyond authority'. They are on an insidious fascist agenda to close down free speech using the racism laws, and various bodies are using Stasi tactics of detaining on spurious mental grounds or invented charges. Many of our Social Services are no better than the waffen SS, as the thought police Rochdale fostering debacle shows quite clearly. They are out to quash any political opposition by foul means. To see quite how many 'graduates' there are you can find a partial list at http://www.cpexposed.com/graduates . Marcus Tulius Cicero of ancient Rome was right about treachery within the gates and the corridors of power. The most insulting thing about them, is the fact that public money paid for the courses, which were on the surface management training. I don't think that CPSOs will probably come into contact with these people, but attested officers might.
  14. Naomi, on 24 November 2012 - 12:02 PM, said: And your point is what precisely?? The precise point Naomi and Jaydee is not to criticise the work PCSOs do, but to make you aware that you can be co-opted to any force without any fuss, even a foreign one, or a private one, because you are not connected to the Queen by oath, just as the new PCC does not swear an oath to Her Majesty. PCSOs are therefore up for grabs, and could be asked to work against attested officers! It is a subtle difference, and it has been brought about purposely.
  15. It is a question of allegiance by oath, as to whom attested police constables, and non-attested PCSOs owe their duty to. Chief Constables are appointed by Her Majesty and given a medal as far as I know, and so it is illegal for a PCC to sack one, unless we all agree that the Queen is no longer sovereign, and parliament have taken it upon themselves to own the people's sovereignty. CC's through Her Majesty owe their allegiance to the public, just as also do PC's. PCSO's on the other hand are not asked to swear their allegiance to anyone - correct me if I'm wrong! The New Police and Crime Commissioners do not swear their oath to Her Majesty and through her the people, so exactly where does their allegiance lie, and more to the point Which force - Eurogendfor (EU's military police force)given that this appointment is EU directed? The Police and Crime Commissioners' oath "I do solemnly and sincerely promise that I will serve all the people of Force Area in the office of police and crime commissioner without fear or favour. I will act with integrity and diligence in my role and, to the best of my ability, will execute the duties of my office to ensure that the police are able to cut crime and protect the public. I will give a voice to the public, especially victims of crime and work with other services to ensure the safety of the community and effective criminal justice. I will take all steps within my power to ensure transparency of my decisions, so that I may be properly held to account by the public. I will not seek to influence or prevent any lawful and reasonable investigation or arrest, nor encourage any police action save that which is lawful and justified within the bounds of this office."