Reasonable Man

Resident Members
  • Content count

    505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Reasonable Man last won the day on April 6

Reasonable Man had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

86 Excellent

About Reasonable Man

  • Rank
    On My Way

Recent Profile Visitors

5,894 profile views
  1. APP on this states the escalation process for dealing with possession of cannabis. First time Cannabis Warning, second time PND, subsequent times arrest. Step outside of that if you wish but you must justify for decision to do so. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Complain to your local council's environmental health dept about the noise nuisance. You describe no criminal offence here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Why would the victim be interviewed under caution? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  4. You are committing crimes as below. Sexual Offences Act 2003, Section 9,Sexual activity with a child (1)A person aged 18 or over (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally touches another person (B), (b)the touching is sexual, and ©either— (i)B is under 16 and A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or over, or (ii)B is under 13. (2)A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the touching involved— (a)penetration of B’s anus or vagina with a part of A’s body or anything else, (b)penetration of B’s mouth with A’s penis, ©penetration of A’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body, or (d)penetration of A’s mouth with B’s penis,is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years. (3)Unless subsection (2) applies, a person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both; (b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years. AND Section 13, Child sex offences committed by children or young persons (1)A person under 18 commits an offence if he does anything which would be an offence under any of sections 9 to 12 if he were aged 18. (2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both; (b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. A Mod will be along with a legal disclaimer, in the meantime I paraphrase - anonymous posters on a forum may or may not have legal knowledge. You may get some opinions that may be helpful or a load of tosh. Criminally you are pretty safe on private land as long as the public do not have access. Morally I question the mixing of alcohol and vehicles/ driving in any circumstances. Why do you feel the need to have alcohol to be enjoying yourself? If you become the success you wish you will be making an impression on viewers who will not be clear on you being on private land. Some may wish to emulate their hero Bill, who has a beer when fixing up his car then drives it. So they have a couple of Stella while changing the brake pads on their Corsa and drives off down the road. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Quite right. I don't know why people get confused. 'Big knives' are not offensive weapons per se, hence the reason why the 1988 Act made it illegal to have them in public. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. No. I am saying that if a delivery driver was found to be in possession of a 4" locking blade then he would be suspected of possessing an article with a blade or that is sharply pointed. It would be up to him to show that he had it for use at work. It is not enough just to say you use it at work you to show why you need it. I don't see why you need a 4" blade to cut some sellotape. A police officer was recently charged with this offence for having a multi-tool on him that had a locking blade. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Your looking at the wrong issue. You seem to be saying you have a 4" knife that you want an excuse to carry. You should be saying you have boxes you need to open so what is a suitable blade to cut packing tape with. A retractable Stanley knife seems suitable or a 1" non locking pen knife. If you don't need a 4" blade to solve your issue then you'd struggle that it is a reasonable excuse. Otherwise why not a machete or a samurai sword? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. Why does a 2.9 inch blade not fit the bill? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Rewrite your script so your first comment to Claire is, 'Hi Claire. I'm glad you're in, was concerned that Fido was distressed. He seemed to be tangled up in his lead. But you're here now. Bye.' Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Section 47 of the Children Act 1989 places a duty on Local Authorities to investigate and make inquiries into the circumstances of children considered to be at risk of ‘significant harm’ and, where these inquiries indicate the need, to decide what action, if any, it may need to take to safeguard and promote the child’s welfare. Agencies dealing with children who have a concern are obliged to share any relevant information with partner agencies - police, health, education, Local Authority (Social Services). A Sec 47 meeting is held and action considered. The child may not have been taken from the mother and put into care but take doesn't mean no action was taken.
  12. A solicitor. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. The welfare of any child who the suspect may have access to will be dealt with by a multi-agency approach. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. Attempted murder has the same maximum sentence as Sec 18 Wounding - life imprisonment. So why go to the expense and risk of a trial when the judge will still be able to sentence based on the established facts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. PCW means a subject access request under the Data Protection Act. It depends on what the matter was that was being investigated and whether you have any other information held on you. Also whether other people were involved. At the lowest level it is solely about one person and not a serious matter, not violent or sexual, then the information should be disposed of after 6 years. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk