Who makes the best Police Officers?? PSCO v No Experience
#1
Posted 17 January 2010 - 07:33 PM
So I had a interesting conversation today with a senior officer of my local force about who makes the best students/police officers between PCSO’s or people who have worked in different jobs outside the police.
As a student in waiting I felt PSCO’s would have an advantage over myself as they have had the experience of working alongside regular police officers, have a knowledge of laws & regulations and would of dealt with confrontation situations.
The officer I spoke to had a different take and felt PSCO’s generally wouldn’t be as good as they often think they know more than they do, so don’t tend to work as hard. Sometimes they have developed bad habits and that will be difficult to get out and often have a “chip on their shoulder”
I know everyone is different, so difficult to generalise, but it would be good to get other opinions.
Thanks
PGWB
#2
Posted 17 January 2010 - 08:15 PM
I know quite a few PCSO's who have failed the selecetion process because they took it for granted they'd get in, and I know a couple of arrogant ones who think if they want it they should be entitled to it, or they should at least get an easier ride.
It's the person that makes the Police Officer IMO, not what they have done prior to becoming one.
#3
Posted 17 January 2010 - 09:53 PM
I know some may debate this however the two roles are completely different, In the 18 weeks of basic training PCSOs were not mentioned once on the curriculum, neither were the roles of specials or police staff. What was mentioned was what would be expected as a Police Constable and how to act as one whilst on active duty.
One of these qualities is not to act on just assumption.
To answer the question the people who make the best Police Officers are the people with the best attitudes. The ones who know how to treat people, the ones who are open and honest. The ones who respect the Office of Constable and understand the responsibility involved and how your role impacts upon people. You cant in my opinion be a good police officer just because you have experience of the police, its what you do with the experience you gain while becoming a police officer.
This post has been edited by Jims: 17 January 2010 - 09:56 PM
#4
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:24 AM
presidentbush, on Jan 17 2010, 07:33 PM, said:
So I had a interesting conversation today with a senior officer of my local force about who makes the best students/police officers between PCSO’s or people who have worked in different jobs outside the police.
As a student in waiting I felt PSCO’s would have an advantage over myself as they have had the experience of working alongside regular police officers,
have a knowledge of laws & regulations and would of dealt with confrontation situations.
The officer I spoke to had a different take and felt PSCO’s generally wouldn’t be as good as they often think they know more than they do, so don’t tend to work as hard. Sometimes they have developed bad habits and that will be difficult to get out and often have a “chip on their shoulder”
I know everyone is different, so difficult to generalise, but it would be good to get other opinions.
Thanks
PGWB
I would have to agree, and I think we have seen a little of that behaviour /attitude on here. You know what they say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!!
#5
Posted 18 January 2010 - 11:04 AM
ike-fungipoke, on Jan 18 2010, 12:24 AM, said:
I think that was what my friend was getting at and felt it generally easier to train somone up who had no experience rather than somone who thought they had a decent knowledge of the law.
It was interesting to hear from Jims that the job of a pcso was never mentioned throughout the training and how different the roles seem to be.
I suppose overall it does come down to each individual person and how hard they are prepared to work.
#6
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:45 PM
PCSO's can get a grasp of what a police officers world is like, but they still have alot to learn, as the two roles are completely different.
In short PCSO's may know the lingo, but that does not mean they will make good police officers, even I don't know how I will be, depending if I ever get the chance to do the job, that is....
#7
Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:43 PM
the training regular officer receive is meant to take some one with no knowedge of police work into a competant officer, the abilites and capabilites of any officer are mainly down to that individual. their personal make up, life experiences etc.
you cannot make a sweeping judgement on a person or group of people just because of their previous employment
its always been thought that anyone who was competant and served as a special would have a initial advantage in training, basic knowledge of laws and procedures, used to the terminology and used to wearing the uniform and the reaction you get from the public, however everyone else soon caught up due to the way training is structured.
PCSO role was not around when i wnet to training school so cant comment from personal experience, i would imagine though it would be a similar situation initial advantage in settlling in soon leveled off.
#8
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:50 PM
Not sure if this is another attempt at slagging off PCSO's or not iwouldnt say PCSO often have a chip on their shoulder
Sykes,
As the original poster this was not an attempt to slag off pcso's. I actually stated that i felt that pcso's would have advantage, but was surprised by the comments of a friend who currently serves with D&C Police.
I think any negative things said by others were not a generalisation, but have maybe had situations when a pcso's has been a little cocky or arrogant. I'm sure there have been many other people who acted the same even though they had no police experience.
Most of us seem to agree that the best PC's are those who want it the most & work the hardest and overall previous experience doesnt make a great deal of difference.
PGWB
#9
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:51 PM
My application to be a PC is going in tomorrow and I am under no illusion that my current job will make it any easier as the application procedure requires zero policing experience and if anything I will be working harder to curb my knowledge of policing if I make it to the assessment centre or it will threaten to fail me! My grasp of the law etc is better than a person with no policing background but it doesn't mean I wont listen during lessons that I believe I already have knowledge of, if anything I will work harder to improve on what I already know and try to increase my knowledge!
So no being a PCSO gives little advantage in the sense of training because as with PCSO training I know for a fact that everybody will be trained at the same level and will advance at the same speed and people with no policing background can become just as complacent as somebody with a policing background. But if anybody tries to compare who makes the better PC they are barking up the wrong tree as it all comes down to your ability to learn and deal with people and people in other jobs deal with people as much as a PCSO or a PC does and therefore may have excellent communication skills regardless of policing background.
#10
Posted 22 January 2010 - 03:29 PM
I now have a start date for June, and I am under no illusion that some of the training I am going find just as difficult as someone who has come off the streets.
I also have no idea how I will perform as a Police Officer, but hope I will make a good one, the dedication and determination is definitely there though.
#11
Posted 22 January 2010 - 03:48 PM
To generalize whether a former PCSO makes a better PC is pointless.
During the training programme, the former PCSO will be able to help those without any experience in some areas - and also those without any policing experience may and will help the former PCSO in other ways.
What we have to do is to exploit our good qualities / skills, and work on those areas which are weaker. If we work as ONE team, that will be of benefit to all of us, and ultimately the community for which both PCSO and PC have pledged to work.
#12
Posted 23 January 2010 - 12:23 PM
In recent times I feel that we have moved away from the old definition of a constable that encompasses the community.
Alot more people are from what I would call a 'posh' background and dealing with our average client base is a major shock.This stems from the job wanting less complaints someone more well to do is less likely to tell someone what they really think.Another generalisation but it was based on my experiences of being a tutor 2000 -2005 and a probationer trainer 05-08 alot less diamonds in the rough came through towards the end.
The ideal background tended to be uni education, some experience in customer services then PCSO.
Being a special could be a double edged sword by stepping up to the plate wanting to be a police officer ( although of course its nothing like it most of the time i.e paperwork/computer work) and walk the walk as such some people would scupper their own chances of ever being a regular by being a tosser causing more problems than they solved.Or on the other hand the best ones have more or less been begged to be a regular due to creating a very positive reputation.
Going off topic a bit we had a bit of a purge and tried to rid ourselves of some of the uniform carrier specials.You think that the criminal fraternity can be evasive.The amount of chasing up we did was unbelieveable and then they wouldn't resign and promised to do some hours which never happened.Then we cold called them and the amount of houses they lived in that were police 'shrines' beggared belief.In the end it got left in the too difficult pile and the area lost out on keen specials due to the quota being full on paper......... I digress.............
Anyway also being accepted as a regular isn't a character changing event and there are plenty of unsuitable people in the job.It is possible to sneak under the wire and ###### your way in and its the a devils own job to get rid,so there are just as many lazy incompetents as anywhere else in the world of work.
Interesting thread!
#14
Posted 23 January 2010 - 01:02 PM
Further to this, every officer I have spoken to who was a former PCSO said that I need to be prepared for a bit of a shock.
Just shows how little being a PCSO prepares you for the job.
Being in a classroom, yes I will have a bit more knowledge regarding some legislation, obviously I will have more experience using the radio, but that is a fraction of what a job involves.
I am really worried about making my first arrest, having to deal with a really confrontational situation, when it comes to situations like this I am in exactly the same position as anyone else.
#15
Posted 23 January 2010 - 08:02 PM
You'll be clued up on your force's jargon, have good practices such as noticing street names as standard, being able to recognise a buck from 10 paces and if you Police the same area you supported.. you'll know the nominals, vulnerables and ratruns. You'll be a whizz at ironing your uniform efficiently (you know what I mean :thumbsup: ), confident in speaking with every type of person and appreciate that what they tell you in copschool is worth balls when you go out on area.
However, like someone said, it reallly all depends on the person. A slacker is a slacker no matter what job they do. Similarly don't fall into the over-confident trap. As a probie, you are still bottom of the food chain.
#16
Posted 23 January 2010 - 10:04 PM
My team tend to shelter me from really major stuff as they are aware of my limitations as a PCSO.
Also, I have been advised that when I start my PC training not to go in there making a big issue out of the fact that I have been a PCSO for over six years(by the time I start training), they have advised me to go in there and act like everyone else, Obviously if the trainers ask me about what I have done in the past I will tell them, and if anyone asks for advice about the job I will offer help with the stuff I know, such as crime reports etc.
I have been given some very good advice by former PCSO's, and I am going to take their advice on board, afterall no one understands the transition more than them.
#17
Posted 24 January 2010 - 12:16 AM
Is thick skinned and is very calm, doesn't mind working nights and above all; a sense of humor.
#18
Posted 29 January 2010 - 10:27 AM
#19
Posted 29 January 2010 - 06:26 PM
finbarfin, on Jan 29 2010, 10:27 AM, said:
I completely and utterly disagree :thumbsup: I appreciate PCSO's for the role they have been employed to do. If it weren't for ours, I'd be on every crime scene (pretty much every day), doing all the letter drops, reassurance visits, hi vis patrolling, asb callbacks, door checks, priority meetings, crime prevention stalls and the the other bits that they do whilst I can concentrate on locking people up and investigating my crimes.
Looking at your posts, it appears that you are a recruit awaiting a start date. Whilst you are entitled to your opinion, please keep an open mind until you work alongside your PCSO colleagues. :bye:
#20
Posted 29 January 2010 - 06:30 PM
finbarfin, on Jan 29 2010, 10:27 AM, said:
What do you actually know (or think you know) about PCSO's? I would say you know extremely little about what we do and if you walk into your station with that attitude don't expect to make any friends at least if WYP is anything to go by. So you are a recruit awaiting a start date? Come from a policing background? Worked alongside a PCSO? I think not!
Do me a favour mate and keep your ignorant and ill-informed comments to yourself....

Help














